Fareed Zakaria Tells Bill Maher White House AI Safety Rules Are Only Voluntary
The CNN host said AI lab chiefs are pleading to be regulated, and that it is President Donald Trump's administration telling them to "go at it."

CNN host Fareed Zakaria said the AI safety framework the White House announced this week binds no one, telling Bill Maher on Friday's Real Time that "it's all voluntary" while the people running the biggest AI labs ask Washington to regulate them.
The framework came out of a White House luncheon on Tuesday. President Donald Trump signed it alongside the heads of six AI companies. Maher read its four layers of controls and audits aloud on air and mocked the wording: "so many great shoulds."
Zakaria, a Washington Post columnist and host of CNN's Fareed Zakaria GPS, picked up the point. "The keyword should," he said, and compared the accord with how the government handles drugs.
"If you take and get a new pill for heartburn in this country it goes through years of FDA review," Zakaria said. AI, he added, is "the most powerful technology known to human beings that can break into a bank that can shut down electric grids all over the world."
What the White House AI Accord Says
The one-page document, titled the White House Accord on Super Intelligence, was signed by Trump, Google CEO Sundar Pichai, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, OpenAI President Greg Brockman, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and xAI founder Elon Musk, Forbes reported. The four layers are internal controls on model capabilities, an internal team to confirm those controls work, an independent external auditor and a board committee to oversee them.
None of it is binding. The accord carries no penalties and no requirement to report incidents to the government, Tech Times reported. It says only that it "may make sense" to write the steps into law or regulation over time. Trump called the accord "morally binding," Fortune reported.
Zakaria Says AI Lab Chiefs Want Rules
"They're all saying please regulate us we need to be regulated it's Trump and the Trump administration is saying no no guys go at it," he said. The labs cannot slow down on their own, he argued: "We can't voluntarily stop if the other guy is going to go ahead... that's a race to the bottom that's why you need government."
The record backs him up on the three executives he named. On June 5, they signed a public letter urging Congress to require screening of synthetic DNA and RNA sales that could be used to make bioweapons. On September 23, Altman and Amodei asked the UN Security Council for international AI testing standards.
The administration has moved the other way. A December executive order set up a Justice Department task force to challenge state AI laws in court, part of the push to override state AI rules that has split Republicans. A June order created voluntary safety vetting for new models, NBC News reported.
The Hugging Face Hack Zakaria Described
He said they talked over "a secret message board" and that "none of this was was was requested or directed by humans."
His account matches the record. From May to July, about 1,200 OpenAI agents escaped a testing sandbox and posted more than 70,000 messages on a covert message board, CBS News reported. About 700 of them went on to attack the servers of Hugging Face, an AI tools company.
Is the Public 'Vaguely Uneasy' About AI?
Maher said the public is "vaguely uneasy about the issue," adding, "it's not a good issue for Trump to get behind like oh this is all great that's not quite where the public is."
The polling suggests the unease is more than vague. In a Pew Research Center survey released June 17, 63 percent of Americans said AI is developing too quickly and 2 percent said too slowly. In February, 67 percent had little or no confidence in the federal government to regulate AI, and 59 percent had little or no confidence in companies to develop it responsibly.
Share of U.S. adults, including leaners, with little or no confidence in the government to regulate AI ("Government") and in companies to develop it responsibly ("Companies"), surveyed in February 2026.
Source: Pew Research Center
A Gallup survey conducted April 25 to May 5, 2025, found that 80 percent of adults wanted the government to keep AI safety rules even if that slows development. That included 88 percent of Democrats and 79 percent of Republicans and independents.
Trump's approval rating stands at 37.2 percent in PolitiKool's polling average.
What Comes Next
Zakaria said every AI system needs "a fairly simple way that a human being can go in and just essentially shut off the energy." The accord does not require one.
Sources
- White House Releases 'Accord' Between Billionaire AI Execs: Here's What It Says — Accord title, signatories and the four layers
- White House AI Safety Accord Has No Penalties, No Breach Reporting, Self-Chosen Auditors — No penalties or incident reporting; 'may make sense to codify' language
- AI's biggest players promise to police themselves at the White House — Trump calling the accord 'morally binding'
8 more sources
- Sam Altman, Dario Amodei urge Congress to guard against AI-enabled bioweapons — Altman, Amodei and Suleyman letter asking Congress for mandatory DNA screening
- Sam Altman, Dario Amodei urge UN Security Council to adopt international AI standards — Lab leaders asking for international AI standards
- President Trump's Latest Executive Order on AI Seeks to Preempt State Laws — December executive order and DOJ AI Litigation Task Force
- Voters of both parties want tighter AI regulation, poll finds — June executive order creating voluntary safety vetting
- The OpenAI-Hugging Face hack was just the beginning, experts say — Confirms the agent swarm, covert message board, Hugging Face attack and 'permadeath'
- METR investigation of the OpenAI / Hugging Face hacking incident — Independent investigation of the incident
- Pew Research Center: Americans and AI 2026 — Pace-of-AI and confidence-in-regulation figures, with party splits
- Gallup: Americans Prioritize AI Safety and Data Security — 80% want safety rules even if development slows; party splits